Crypto-Jewish Jesuits

Geschrieben von deckard am 26.05.2018 11:43:31:

Solving the Mystery of BABYLON THE GREAT
von Edward Hendrie (Autor)


Wer sind die Jesuiten 7 Crypto-Jewish Jesuits
As we have seen, the Roman Catholic church represents a gentile front for Jewish religious
doctrines. Jews from time to time go from supporting the Catholic church to undermining it.
Ultimately, the Jews have plans to rid themselves of that front when it no longer serves their
purposes. It is only in that sense that Pinay’s characterization of the Jews as a fifth column
within the Catholic church has validity.
A good example of the duality of the Jews being both a defender of the church and also its
destroyer is the Catholic order of the Jesuits. What most do not know is that the Jesuit order is a
Crypto-Jewish order of priests. While it may have gentile priests as members, it was founded by
Jews and today has close secret ties with other clandestine Jewish organizations. Benjamin
Disraeli, was a Jew and a former Prime Minister of England; he revealed that the first Jesuits
were Jews. Ignatius of Loyola’s secretary, Po 103 lanco, was of Jewish descent and was the only
person present at Loyola’s deathbed. Ignatius Loyola himself was a crypto-Jew of the Occult
Kabbalah. A crypto-Jew is a Jew who converts to another religion and outwardly embraces the
new religion, while secretly maintaining Jewish practices.
James Lainez (J.G. 1558-1565), who succeeded Ignatius Loyola (J.G. 1541-1556) as the
second Jesuit General, was also of Jewish descent. The fourth Jesuit General was a Belgian Jew
named Eberhard Mercurian (J.G. 1573-1580).104 Jews were attracted to the Jesuit order and
joined in large numbers.105 Some of the most influential Jesuits in history, such as Francisco
Ribera (1537-1591) and Emanuel Lacunza (1731-1801), were Jews. During the 5th General
Congregation in 1593 of the 27 Jesuits who proposed changes to the Constitutions, 25 were of
either Jewish or Moorish descent.106 Many of the Jesuit doctrines are similar to those found in
the Kabbalah and Babylonian Talmud. It is possible that the second beast in the book of
Revelation is the Jesuit General, who is known as the black pope.
John Torell explains the Jewish origins of the Jesuit order:
49
The Illuminati order was not invented by Adam Weishaupt, but rather renewed
and reformed. The first known Illuminati order (Alumbrado) was founded in 1492
by Spanish Jews, called "Marranos," who were also known as "crypto-Jews."
With violent persecution in Spain and Portugal beginning in 1391, hundreds of
thousands of Jews had been forced to convert to the faith of the Roman Catholic
Church. Publicly they were now Roman Catholics, but secretly they practiced
Judaism, including following the Talmud and the Cabala. The Marranos were able
to teach their children secretly about Judaism, but in particular the Talmud and the
Cabala, and this huge group of Jews has survived to this very day. After 1540
many Marranos opted to flee to England, Holland, France, the Ottoman empire
(Turkey), Brazil and other places in South and Central America. The Marranos
kept strong family ties and they became very wealthy and influential in the nations
where they lived. But as is the custom with all Jewish people, it did not matter in
what nation they lived, their loyalty was to themselves and Judaism. 107
* * *
In 1491 San Ignacio De Loyola was born in the Basque province of Guipuzcoa,
Spain. His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was very
wealthy. As a young man he became a member of the Jewish Illuminati order
in Spain. As a cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as
a Roman Catholic. On May 20, 1521 Ignatius (as he was now called) was
wounded in a battle, and became a semi-cripple. Unable to succeed in the military
and political arena, he started a quest for holiness and eventually ended up in Paris
where he studied for the priesthood. In 1539 he had moved to Rome where he
founded the "JESUIT ORDER," which was to become the most vile, bloody and
persecuting order in the Roman Catholic Church. In 1540, the current Pope Paul
III approved the order. At Loyola’s death in 1556 there were more than 1000
members in the Jesuit order, located in a number of nations. 108
Setting up the Jesuit order, Ignatius Loyola devised an elaborate spy system, so
that no one in the order was safe. If there was any opposition, death would come
swiftly. The Jesuit order not only became a destructive arm of the Roman Catholic
Church; it also developed into a secret intelligence service. While the Popes
relied more and more on the Jesuits, they were unaware that the hard core
leadership were Jewish, and that these Jews held membership in the
Illuminati order which despised and hated the Roman Catholic Church.109
The Jesuits were established by Ignatius of Loyola. Ignatius of Loyola was the leader of a
secret occult organization known as the Alumbrados (Spanish for Illuminati).110 On August 15,
1534, Loyola started a sister organization to the Alumbrados, which he called the Society of
Jesus, it is more commonly known today as the Jesuits. Loyola was arrested by the Dominican
order of Catholic inquisitors, who were concerned with his growing influence and power
50
throughout Europe. Because of his influential allies among the principalities of Europe, he was
granted an audience with the pope. Loyola promised the pope his allegiance and agreed to do the
bidding of the papacy throughout the world. Pope Paul III formally approved the Jesuits as a
Catholic religious order in his 1540 papal bull Regimini Militantis Eccclesiae.111
The influence of the Jews through the Jesuits in the Roman Catholic Church has been
manifested from the beginning in Catholic doctrine. The Council of Trent was an attack on
Christianity with anathema after anathema against Christian doctrine that was orchestrated by the
Jesuits. The control of the Jews over the Vatican is so complete that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger
(now Pope Benedict XVI), who is the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,
issued an official doctrine of Catholic faith that accepts the Jewish view that the messiah is yet to
come. There is apparently much double talk in the document, as it accepts the Jewish view of a
coming messiah without overtly rejecting Jesus. Some have interpreted the document as denying
the redemptive role of Jesus. The Catholic Church long ago implicitly denied the redemptive
role of Jesus. The document is contained in a small book titled “The Jewish People and the Holy
Scriptures in the Christian Bible.” It is no surprise that this Jewish/Catholic doctrine was drafted
by a Jesuit named Albert Vanhoye.112
The Jewish influence over the Roman Catholic institution and its doctrines is manifest in
The Document of the Vatican Commission for Religious Relations with Judaism § 4, which
states: “We propose, in the future, to remove from the Gospel of St. John the term, ‘the
Jews’ where it is used in a negative sense, and to translate it, ‘the enemies of Christ.’”113
At a speech at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Roman Catholic Cardinal Joseph Bernadine
stated:
[T]here is need for . . .theological reflection, especially with what many consider
to be the problematic New Testament’s texts ... Retranslation ... and
reinterpretation certainly need to be included among the goals we pursue in the
effort to eradicate anti-semitism.
[T]he gospel of John ... is generally considered among the most problematic of all
New Testament books in its outlook towards Jews and Judaism ... this teaching of
John about the Jews, which resulted from the historical conflict between the
church and synagogue in the latter part of the first century C.E., can no longer be
taught as authentic doctrine or used as catechesis by contemporary Christianity ...
Christians today must see that such teachings ... can no longer be regarded as
definitive teachings in light of our improved understanding.114
In ancient Palestine the Jews worked hand in hand with the Romans to crucify Christ. Now,
the Jews work hand in glove with the Roman Catholic Church in their effort to eradicate Christ’s
gospel. The great harlot of Babylon in Revelation 17:5 has Mystery written upon her forehead.
She is called Babylon because she is Babylonian. She is a mystery because she masquerading as
51
“the” Christian religion. Christian labels have been applied to Babylonian paganism to come up
with the mystery religion we know as the Roman Catholic Church. Both the Talmudic Jews and
the Vatican share that common Babylonian root. The Jesuits nurtured the Babylonian Cabalism
in Roman Catholic doctrine. The similarities between the imperious whorish woman in Ezekiel
16:14-40 and the Mother of Harlots in Revelation 17:5 are unmistakable. They are one and the
same. Roman Catholicism is an esoteric version of Babylonian Judaism. The Roman Church
appears gentile to the uninitiated, but it is Jewish to its core. Orthodox Judaism appears to the
uninitiated to be the Old Testament theology, but it is actually Babylonian to its core.
The Extreme Oath of the Jesuits, which is given to a Jesuit Priest when he is elevated to a
position of command, contains the following provisions:
I . . . declare and swear that his holiness, the Pope, is Christ’s Vice-regent, and is
the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth.
* * *
Therefore, to the utmost of my power, I shall and will defend this doctrine and his
Holiness’ right and customs against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant
authority, whatever especially the Luthern Church of Germany, Holland,
Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, and the now pretended authority of the Church of
England and Scotland, the branches of the same, now where . . . . . I do now
renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state
named Protestant or Liberals, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or
officers.
* * *
That I will go to any part of the world, whatsoever, without murmuring and will
be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me . . . . . I do further
promise and declare, that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage
relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I
am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole
earth, and that I will spare neither sex, age, nor condition, and that I will hang,
waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the
stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants’ heads against the
wall, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race.
That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poison cup, the
strangulation cord, the steel of the poinard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the
honor, rank, dignity or authority of the person or persons whatsoever may be their
condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do
by any agent of the pope or superior of the brotherhood of the holy faith of the
52
Society of Jesus.115
The Jesuits are the secret army of the Roman church, they are often referred to as the “pope’s
militia.” In fact, the leader of the Jesuits is called the “Jesuit General.” He is unlike any other
leader of a Catholic order, because the Jesuit General is independent of the Catholic Bishops and
Cardinals; he answers directly to the Pope. Because of the power and influence of the Jesuit
General, he is known as the “Black Pope.” The Jesuit General has the purported authority to
absolve persons of the sins of bigamy, murder, or any harm done to others as long as the matter is
not publicly known and the cause of a scandal.116 Pope Gregory XII gave the Jesuits the authority
to deal in commerce and banking, which has made the order quite wealthy.117 The popes have
threatened princes, kings, and anyone else who interferes with the Jesuits with excommunication
(Latae Sententiae).118 In one of the most authoritative works on the Jesuits, J. Huber, professor
of Catholic theology wrote: “Here is a proven fact: the Constitutions [of the Jesuits] repeat five
hundred times that one must see Christ in the person of the [Jesuit] General.”119
If the Jesuits is a Crypto-Jewish order that hates the Roman Catholic church, as alleged by
Torell, why would it become a priestly order within that church and become its greatest defender
with extreme oaths of obedience to the pope? Because, the Roman church offers the Jews an
ideal cover from which to wage war against Christianity. This is evidenced by the fact that the
Jesuits virtually controlled the Council of Trent, which produced anathema after anathema
against bible believing Christians and fundamental Christian doctrine. This same Jesuit
organization, however, opposed the inquisition.120 Why? Because the inquisition, in part, was
initiated to root out crypto-Jewry inside the Catholic church. Of course, an organization founded
and controlled by crypto-Jews would oppose a strategy that would expose its own Jewish core.
The hierarchy of Orthodox Jews hate gentiles; ostensibly gentile organizations like the
Roman church offer an ideal front from which to strike against the hated Christians. That is why
God refers to the great harlot of Babylon as “MYSTERY.” The Roman church appears to the
world to be a gentile religious organization, yet it is to its core Jewish. As long at the Roman
church does the bidding of the Jews, they will defend it. Once the Roman church is no longer
useful it will shed it like a snake sheds its old skin.
It seems that the Jews have the destruction of the Roman church all planned out. The
following is a passage from the THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
that seem to foretell the destruction of the Vatican by the nations of the world.
When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible
hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling
themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to
save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels
53
and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the
entire strength of this place.121
That is very similar to the prophecy found in the book of Revelation.
And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore,
and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her
with fire. For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give
their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. And the
woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the
earth. (Revelation 17:16-18 AV)
The horns of the beast are ten kings on the beast that is being ridden by the great harlot who
sits on seven mountains (the Vatican). Revelation 17. The PROTOCOLS have set forth the
planned destruction of the Vatican. The PROTOCOLS seem also to have provided for the
entrance of the antichrist. “THE KING OF THE JEWS WILL BE THE REAL POPE OF THE
UNIVERSE, THE PATRIARCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHURCH.”122
In fact, the Jesuits, the great defenders of the Catholic faith have actually exercised their
power to undermine the authority of the church and bring it to its knees. The reason the Jesuits
retaliated against the Catholic church was that the Jesuits were at one time dissolved as a
Catholic order because of their subversive conduct. The subversion of the European nations by
the Jesuits became so great that an immense amount of military and political pressure was
brought against the pope by the European nations. Finally, Pope Clement XIII decided on the 3rd
of February 1769 to dissolve the Jesuits. While Jesuits are under an oath of allegiance to the
pope, that oath is secondary to their extreme oath of allegiance to the Jesuit General:
I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or
any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver [perinde ac cadaver]
but unhesitatingly, obey each and very command that I may receive from my
superiors in the Militia of the Pope and Jesus Christ.123
The night before Pope Clement XIII was to execute the dissolution, however, he suddenly
fell ill and died. Prior to his death he cried out “I am dying . . . It is a very dangerous thing to
attack the Jesuits.”124 His successor, Pope Clement XIV, was also put under tremendous political
pressure to dissolve the Jesuits, but he resisted doing so for three years until the political tension
finally forced his hand. Pope Clement XIV issued the papal brief of dissolution, Dominus ac
Redemptor, on August 16, 1773.125 Pope Clement XIV knew the significance of such an act to
the papacy, he exclaimed: “I have cut off my right hand.”126 In addition, Pope Clement XIV
54
knew that by signing the brief dissolving the Jesuits he was signing his own death warrant. Soon
after signing the brief the letters I.S.S.S.V. appeared on the palace walls in the Vatican.127 Pope
Clement XIV knew what it meant and explained that it stood for In Settembre, Sara Sede
Vacante. Which translated means “in September, the See will be vacant (the pope will be
dead).”128 Pope Clement XIV was poisoned and died on September 22, 1774.129
Interestingly, it was just three years after Pope Clement XIV’s suppression of the Jesuits that
the subversive organization the “Illuminati” was purportedly founded by a trained Jesuit named
Adam Weishaupt in 1776.130 Weishaupt was a Jew and a professor of canon law at Ingolstadt
University, which was a Jesuit University and the center of the Jesuit counter-reformation.131
Alberto Rivera, a former Jesuit priest, stated that the occult Illuminati organization was not
founded by Weishaupt, as many believe, but in fact was established long before Weishaupt. The
Illuminati is in fact a reincarnation of the ancient Alumbrados, whose one time leader was
Ignatius of Loyola, the founder of the Jesuits.132 The Illuminati was established by Lorenzo
Ricco, the Jesuit General, in 1776, who used his disciple, Adam Weishaupt, as the front man for
the new organization (which was really not new at all).133 The Jesuits, having just been
suppressed by the pope in 1773, found it necessary to establish the Illuminati, which was an
alliance between the Jesuits and the very powerful Ashkenazi Jewish Banking House of
Rothschild. The purpose of Weishaupt initially was to avenge the papal suppression of the
Jesuits by rooting out all religion and overturning the governments of the world, bringing them
under a single world government, controlled of course by the Illuminati, under the authority of
their god. That world government is commonly referred to by the Illuminati as the “New World
Order.” The god of the Illuminati is Satan.134
Eric Jon Phelps in his book, The Vatican Assassins, explains:
These 41 years [between their suppression in 1773 by Pope Clement XIV and
their reestablishment by Pope Pius VII in 1814] were absolutely golden for the
Society of Jesus. For the Sons of Loyola punished all their enemies, including the
Dominican priests, perfected the inner workings between themselves and
Freemasonry, creating alliance between the house of Rothschild in establishing
the illuminati; punished and absorbed the Knights of Malta . . . . They used the
Orthodox Catherine of Russia and a Lutheran Frederick of Prussia to conquer and
divide Poland, rendering the pope’s Bull of Suppression of no effect in that
Roman Catholic land. They caused the French Revolution, beheaded a Bourbon
King and a Hapsburg Queen as punishment for being expelled from France and
Austria. With Napoleon, the Freemason, they drove the Bourbons from their
thrown in Spain and the Braganzas from their thrown in Portugal. They even
attempted to take Palestine from the Moslems like the Crusaders of old.135
The company’s most important victories were both religious and political. They
55
deeply penetrated the Russian Orthodox Church and Germany’s Lutheran Church.
It’s Tubingen University specifically. Politically, they took control of the crown
and the Bank of England. For this reason England, with Viscount Palmerston,
would never go to war with France again, it would conduct the Pope’s opium wars
against people of China (just like the company, with its CIA and Mafia
Commission is presently conducting a massive drug trade against the “heretic an
liberal” people of the American Empire) . . . The Jesuits also captured the Papacy
with the Vatican; along with its landed church properties the world over, and for
this reason the Papal Caesar, occupying Satan’s sacred office of the Papacy,
would never suppress the Society of Jesus ever again!136
The secret Illuminati organization was the hidden guiding hand behind the brutal French
Revolution of 1787, during which began in 300,000 people were massacred in a godless orgy of
violence.137 The rage by the Jesuits and their reconstituted Illuminati culminated in 1798, with the
capture of the pope himself. Napoleon’s General Berthier invaded Rome, took the Pope Pius VI
prisoner, and held him until his death.
The Roman Catholic church had learned its lesson. On August 7, 1814, the Jesuits were
restored as a Catholic order by Pope Pius VII.138 John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 1816
“I am not happy about the rebirth of the Jesuits. . . . Swarms of them will present themselves
under more disguises ever taken by even a chief of the Bohemians, as printers, writers,
publishers, school teachers, etc. If ever an association of people deserved eternal damnation, on
this earth and in hell, it is the Society of Loyola. Yet, with our system of religious liberty, we can
but offer them a refuge.”139 Thomas Jefferson answered Adams: “Like you, I object to the
Jesuits’ reestablishment which makes light give way to darkness.”140
In 1835, Samuel Morse, the great inventor of the telegraph, echoed the concerns of Jefferson
and Adams; he described the Jesuits and their threat to the United States as follows:
And do Americans need to be told what Jesuits are? If any are ignorant, let them
inform themselves of their history without delay: no time is to be lost: their
workings are before you in every day’s events: they are a secret society, a sort of
Masonic order, with superadded features of most revolting odiousness and a
thousand times more dangerous. They are not confined to one class on society;
they are not merely priests, or priests of one religious creed, they are merchants,
and lawyers, and editors, and men of any profession, and no profession, having no
outward badge (in this country,) by which to be recognised; they are about in all
your society. They can assume any character that of angels of light, or ministers of
darkness, to accomplish their one great end, the service upon which they are
sworn to start at any moment, in any direction, and for any service, commanded
by the general of their order, bound to no family, community, or country, by the
56
ordinary ties which bind men; and sold for life to the cause of the Roman
Pontiff.141
The concerns of Morse, Adams, and Jefferson were justified; once being reestablished as a
Catholic order the Jesuits did not miss a beat, during the 19th century they fomented revolutions
throughout the world, attempting to bring to power oppressive despots whom they would then
control. They were at one time or another expelled from Russia (1820), Belgium, Portugal
(1834), the Italian states (1859), Spain (three times-1820, 1835, and 1868), Germany (1872),
Guatemala (1872), Mexico (1873), Brazil (1874), Equador (1875), Colombia (1875), Costa Rica
(1884), and France (twice-1880 and 1901). 142 They caused the Swiss Civil war in 1847, as a
result they were banished from Switzerland in 1848.143 Up until the year 2000, the Swiss
Constitution (article 51) prohibited the presence of the Jesuits anywhere in Switzerland.144 In the
year 2000 Switzerland ratified a new constitution, in which article 51 was removed. Those are
just a sampling of the over 70 countries from which the Jesuits have been expelled for
conducting subversive activities. The Jesuit subversion has continued to modern times, causing
the Jesuits to be expelled from Haiti in 1964 and Burma in 1966.145 To this day they are
instigating communist revolutions in South America. The Jesuits’ new brand of South American
communism is known as “Liberation Theology.”
Jesuits have a long and sordid history of distorting moral obligations and practicing and
advocating situational ethics. For example, God commands without exception that “Thou shalt
not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” Exodus 20:16. The Jesuits, on the other hand,
permit the use of ambiguous terms to mislead a judge or outright lying under oath if the witness
makes a mental reservation.146 The Jesuits teach that if a young girl is pregnant, she may obtain
an abortion if the pregnancy would bring dishonor to her or a member of the clergy.147 They do
not stop there, another Jesuit maxim states: “If a Father, yielding to temptation, abuses a woman
and she publicises what has happened, and, because of it, dishonours him, this same Father can
kill her to avoid disgrace.”148 That is not the only cause that is justification for murder. The
Jesuits further teach that “[a] monk or a priest is allowed to kill those who are ready to slander
him or his community.”149
Immorality is not unique to the Jesuit order only. The doctrines of the Catholic Church
allow for all sorts of situational ethics. Thomas Aquinas, the most influential source of economic
and theological doctrines for the Catholic Church, stated that it is lawful and not a sin for a man
to steal another’s property in order to fulfill a basic need. Aquinas’ view was that all goods are
community goods and therefore it is not a sin to take another’s property when you need it.150
That is in fact the official position of the Roman church today as expressed by the Second
Vatican Council. “If one is in extreme necessity he has the right to procure for himself what he
needs out of the riches of others.”151
What is the authority for this ethic? It is found in the Talmud. In Baba Bathra 54b it states:
57
“The property of a heathen is on the same footing as desert land; whoever first occupies it
acquires ownership.”152 Compare that to the eighth commandment of God: “Thou shalt not
steal.” Exodus 20:15. Furthermore, in Baba Kamma 113b its states that if one finds lost property
it must be returned if the owner is a Jew, however if the owner is a gentile it can be kept, “it is to
your brother that you make restoration, but you need not make restoration to a heathen.”153
The Jesuits are zealous persecutors of Christians or anyone whom they view as an enemy of
the Vatican. Jesuits take a solemn oath to destroy Protestant Christians and destroy any
government that offers protection to Protestant Christians.154 They are the natural enemies of
liberty, their whole system is based on thoughtless, ruthless, blind obedience. Ignatious himself
writing to his Jesuits in Portugal said: “We must see black as white if the church says so.”155
Jesuits are the subversive ambassadors of the Catholic Church, bringing chaos and ruin to all
nations they infiltrate. They believe that “[t]he Catholic Church has the right and duty to kill
heretics because it is by fire and sword that heresy can be extirpated. . . . Repentance cannot be
allowed to save them, just as repentance is not allowed to save civil criminals; for the highest
good of the church is the unity of the faith, and this cannot be preserved unless heretics are put to
death.”156
Alberto Rivera, a former Jesuit Priest, was saved by the grace of God and came out of the
Jesuit priesthood. The Jesuits made numerous attempts to kill him before he could reveal the
secrets of the Jesuits. He survived the attempts on his life and exposed much about sinister
methods and motives of the Jesuits.
Franz Wernz, the Jesuit General from 1906-1915, stated that “[t]he Church can condemn
heretics to death, for any rights they have are only through our tolerance, and these rights are
apparent not real”157 That view of heretics having no rights is very similar to the philosophy of
the Jewish Talmud. Sanhedrin 57b provides that if a heathen robs another or a Jew the property
must be returned. If, however, a Jew robs a heathen, the property does not have to be returned to
the heathen.158 That section of the Talmud also states that if a heathen murders another heathen
or a Jew, the heathen should suffer the death penalty. If, however, a Jew kills a heathen “there is
no death penalty.”159 For example, Jewish Rabbi Moseh Levinger was sentenced to a mere 5
months in jail by an Israeli court for the unprovoked cold-blooded murder in September 1988 of
a Palestinian shopkeeper, Hassan Salah.160 Prior to entering prison, Rabbi Levinger was feted at
a party by Israeli President Chaim Herzog and Iseali Army General Yitzhak Mordechai.161
Rabbi Levinger was released from prison after only serving three months.162 Baba Kamma 38a
expressly states that Canaanites are “outside the protection of the civil law of Israel.” Thus a
Canaanite has no remedy against a Jew whose ox gores the Canaanite’s ox, but if a Canaanite’s
ox gores a Jew’s ox, the Canaanite shall pay in full the damages.
Professor Israel Shahak explains:
58
According to the Jewish religion, the murder of a Jew is a capital offense and one
of the three most heinous sins (the other two being idolatry and adultery). Jewish
religious courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish, even beyond the
limits of the ordinary administration of justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew.
A Jew who indirectly causes the death of another Jew is, however, only guilty of
what talmudic law calls a sin against the 'laws of Heaven', to be punished by God
rather than by man.
When the victim is a Gentile, the position is quite different. A Jew who murders a
Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a
court. To cause 163 indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all.164
Thus, one of the two most important commentators on the Shulhan Arukh
explains that when it comes to a Gentile, 'one must not lift one's hand to harm
him, but one may harm him indirectly, for instance by removing a ladder after he
had fallen into a crevice .., there is no prohibition here, because it was not done
directly.165 He points out, however, that an act leading indirectly to a Gentile's
death is forbidden if it may cause the spread of hostility towards Jews.
A Gentile murderer who happens to be under Jewish jurisdiction must be
executed whether the victim was Jewish or not. However, if the victim was
Gentile and the murderer converts to Judaism, he is not punished.166
The animus by Jews toward gentiles, includes a prohibition against giving medical treatment
to gentiles. Israel Shahak explains:
According to the Halakhah, the duty to save the life of a fellow Jew is
paramount.167 It supersedes all other religious obligations and interdictions,
excepting only the prohibitions against the three most heinous sins of adultery
(including incest), murder and idolatry.
As for Gentiles, the basic talmudic principle is that their lives must not be saved,
although it is also forbidden to murder them outright.168 The Talmud itself
expresses this in the maxim 'Gentiles are neither to be lifted [out of a well] nor
hauled down [into it]'. Maimonides169 explains:
"As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war ... their death must not be caused,
but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example,
59
one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written:
'neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow'170 - but [a Gentile] is not
thy fellow."
In particular, a Jewish doctor must not treat a Gentile patient. Maimonides -
himself an illustrious physician - is quite explicit on this; in another passage171 he
repeats the distinction between 'thy fellow' and a Gentile, and concludes: 'and
from this learn ye, that it is forbidden to heal a Gentile even for payment...'
However, the refusal of a Jew - particularly a Jewish doctor - to save the life of a
Gentile may, if it becomes known, antagonize powerful Gentiles and so put Jews
in danger. Where such danger exists, the obligation to avert it supersedes the ban
on helping the Gentile. Thus Maimonides continues: ' ... but if you fear him or his
hostility, cure him for payment, though you are forbidden to do so without
payment.' In fact, Maimonides himself was Saladin's personal physician. His
insistence on demanding payment - presumably in order to make sure that the act
is not one of human charity but an unavoidable duty - is however not absolute. For
in another passage he allows Gentile whose hostility is feared to be treated 'even
gratis, if it is unavoidable'.
The whole doctrine - the ban on saving a Gentile's life or healing him, and the
suspension of this ban in cases where there is fear of hostility - is repeated
(virtually verbatim) by other major authorities, including the 14th century Arba'ah
Turirn and Karo's Beyt Yosef and Shulhan 'Arukh.172 Beyt Yosef adds, quoting
Maimonides: 'And it is permissible to try out a drug on a heathen, if this serves a
purpose'; and this is repeated also by the famous R. Moses Isserles.
The consensus of halakhic authorities is that the term 'Gentiles' in the above
doctrine refers to all non-Jews.173
That Jewish attitude toward non-Jews is the same attitude the crypto-Jewish Jesuits have
toward Christians. Jesuit priests are subjected to certain “spiritual exercises” which were first
devised by Igantious Loyola. During the spiritual exercises the subject becomes possessed and
controlled by a devil.
We imbue into him spiritual forces which he would find very difficult to eliminate
later, forces more lasting than all the best principles and doctrines; these forces
can come up again to the surface, sometimes after years of not even mentioning
them, and become so imperative that the will finds itself unable to oppose any
60
obstacle, and has to follow their irresistible impulse.174
Between 1569 and 1605 the Jesuits orchestrated no less than eleven plots against Protestant
England, which involved invasion, rebellion, and assassination. Each is known by the leader of
the treachery: Ridolfi, Sanders, Gregory XIII, Campion, Parsons, Duke of Guise, Allen,
Throgmorten, Parry, Babington, Sixtus V, Philip II of Spain, Yorke, Walpole, Southwell, and
Guy Fawkes.175
In the 1586 “Babington plot” the Jesuits along with other Catholics planned to Kill
Protestant Queen Elizabeth I, place Catholic Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots on the throne of
England and bring England under subjection to the Pope of Rome. That plot was discovered and
Mary was executed for her troubles.176
After the failed Babington plot, the Pope, in league with Philip II of Spain, planned to invade
England and bring it under papal control. In 1588 Spain brought the 136 ship Spanish Armada
against England. The Sovereign God of the Universe whipped up a freak storm which devastated
the Armada and allowed England with only 30 ships to defeat Spain after an eight hour sea
battle.177
On November 5, 1605 Jesuit led Roman Catholic conspirators planned to Kill King James I
and the entire English Parliament by blowing up the House of Lords. They placed 20 barrels of
gunpowder under the House of Lords. The plan was to blow up the house of Lords when the
Lords, Commons, and King were all assembled on November 5, 1605 for the opening of
Parliament.178 The plot, however, was discovered and the conspirators were captured. To this
day that event is simply referred to as the “Gunpowder Plot.”179 November 5 is a national
holiday in England, commemorating the Catholic conspiracy in the Gunpowder Plot. The
holiday is called Guy Fawkes Day; Guy Fawkes was one of the Gunpowder Plot conspirators.180
The Jesuit subversion of nations has caused 56 countries to ban the Jesuits, most of whom
have since lifted the bans. In 1759 the Jesuits were banned throughout the Portuguese Empire.181
In 1764 the Jesuits were outlawed in France, and in 1767 they were banned from Spain.182 On
April 6, 1762 the French Parliament issued the following “statement of arrest” (indictment):
The said Institute [Jesuits] is inadmissible an any civilised State, as its nature is
hostile to all spiritual and temporal authority; it seeks to introduce into the Church
and States, under the plausible veil of a religious Institute, not an Order truly
desirous to spread evangelical perfection, but rather a political body working
untiringly at usurping all authority, by all kinds of indirect, secret, and devious
means. . . .[The Jesuits’ doctrine is] perverse, a destroyer of all religious and
61
honest principles, insulting to Christian morals, pernicious to civil society, hostile
to the rights of the nation, the royal power, and even the security of the sovereigns
and obedience of their subjects; suitable to stir up the greatest disturbances in the
States, conceive and maintain the worst kind of corruption in men’s hearts.183
All nations should learn from the experience of Protestant England and understand the threat
that Rome and the Jesuits pose to any free country. The Roman Catholic Church uses religious
superstition to usurp the authority and undermine independence of any state. King Henry VIII
cast off the yoke of Rome and declared that he was to be the head of the church in England.
In May 1538, the pope sought his revenge for the separation of the Church of England from
Rome; the pope excommunicated all in Ireland who recognized the supremacy of the King of
England or any ecclesiastical or civil power greater than that of the Roman Catholic Church. The
events are recounted in the classic Foxe’s Book of Martyrs:
A short time after this, the pope sent over to Ireland (directed to the archbishop of
Armagh and his clergy) a bull of excommunication against all who had, or should
own the king's supremacy within the Irish nation; denouncing a curse on all of
them, and theirs, who should not, within forty days, acknowledge to their
confessors, that they had done amiss in so doing.
Archbishop Browne gave notice of this in a letter dated, Dublin, May, 1538. Part
of the form of confession, or vow, sent over to these Irish papists, ran as follows:
"I do further declare him or here, father or mother, brother or sister, son or
daughter, husband or wife, uncle or aunt, nephew or niece, kinsman or
kinswoman, master or mistress, and all others, nearest or dearest relations, friend
or acquaintance whatsoever, accursed, that either do or shall hold, for the time to
come, any ecclesiastical or civil power above the authority of the Mother Church;
or that do or shall obey, for the time to come, any of her, the Mother of Churches'
opposers or enemies, or contrary to the same, of which I have here sworn unto: so
God, the Blessed Virgin, St. Peter, St. Paul, and the Holy Evangelists, help me,"
etc. is an exact agreement with the doctrines promulgated by the Councils of
Lateran and Constance, which expressly declare that no favor should be shown to
heretics, nor faith kept with them; that they ought to be excommunicated and
condemned, and their estates confiscated, and that princes are obliged, by a
solemn oath, to root them out of their respective dominions.184
The political and religious attacks against Protestant England by Rome continued up to and
beyond 1641; in 1641 the beast of Rome planned a murderous insurrection in Ireland. The
objective of the barbarous conspiracy was to murder all Protestants in Ireland, without exception.
62
In this instance, as in many others, we find the Jesuits leading the murderous and maniacal
charge. The Jesuits placed their hellish imprimatur on the massacre by beginning it on the feast
day of their founder, Ignatius of Loyola. When the dust finally settled on the genocide, Rome
had exterminated 150,000 innocent men, women, and children. This massacre illustrates the
danger of a Roman Catholic majority in any country. No matter who seems to control the
political reigns, when the lawful government is at odds with Rome there will be hell to pay.
Rome is a master at mass insurrection through the incitation of base barbarians who have sold
their soul to the superstition of the Roman Cult.
The Irish genocide was planned and orchestrated from the Vatican. It was executed through
the leadership of the Jesuits and the other priests of Rome. He who has eyes let him see through
the pious facade of Rome. He who has understanding let him understand the danger posed by
Rome and the Jesuits. The Roman Catholic Church never changes.
King Henry VIII’s error is all too obvious. For there is only one head of God’s church and
that is Jesus Christ. The pope was incensed at the insolence of King Henry. The pope, however,
was not angry because the king blasphemously claimed the authority of Christ as head of the
church but because the king had replaced him, the supreme pontiff of Rome, as the head of the
church. The King of England was politically too strong for the pope to do anything to change the
situation in England (though he tried), consequently the monarch of England to this day is the
head of the Church of England (known as the Anglican or Episcopal Church). The Episcopal
church is one of the harlot daughters of the Roman Catholic mother of harlots. See Revelation
17:5. For the most part, the leadership of the Episcopal Church are not Christian; they are rather
the proverbial rejected tares growing in Christ’s wheat field.
Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened
unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy
came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But when the blade
was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. So the
servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good
seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares? He said unto them, An enemy
hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather
them up? But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the
wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of
harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them
in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn. . . . Then Jesus sent
the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him,
saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field. He answered and said
unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is the
world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children
of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end
63
of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered
and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. The Son of man shall
send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that
offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire:
there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the righteous shine forth
as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
(Matthew 13:24-30; 36-43 AV)
Let us look at some of the tares in the Episcopal Church: In August 2003 the House of
Deputies for the Episcopal Church elected a Gene Robinson to be the Bishop of New Hampshire.
Gene Robinson left his wife and two daughters to live with another man in an openly sodomite
relationship. He publicly promotes and encourages the sodomite lifestyle. He founded the
Concord, New Hampshire chapter of “Outright,” which is a ministry promoting sodomy and
whose website contains photos of group sex and other pornography. Robinson does not preach
the gospel, he has rejected the gospel and instead preaches the sin of sodomy! These facts about
Robinson were all known by the House of Deputies before they voted to approve Robinson as an
Episcopal Bishop. God has clearly stated that Robinson’s lifestyle and the conduct he promotes
is a sin:
There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of
Israel. (Deuteronomy 23:17 AV)
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. (Leviticus
18:22 AV)
Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving
themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an
example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. (Jude 1:7 AV)
In order for Robinson to installed as a bishop, it was necessary for him to be confirmed by
the Episcopal General Convention. Robinson was later confirmed by the General Convention in
a vote of bishops, where 62 bishops voted to confirm Robinson, and 43 voted against his
confirmation. The confirmation of Robinson is not surprising when one considers the type of
people who make up the leadership of the Episcopal Church. John Shelby Spong retired as
Episcopal Bishop of New Jersey. For his entire career in the Episcopal Church “he wrote and
preached against every tenet of the Christian faith. Bishop Spong did not believe in the virgin
birth, the doctrine of the incarnation, the deity of Christ, the resurrection, or the existence of
God.” David Jenkins who was consecrated a 185 s the bishop of Durham, which is the fourth
highest post in the Episcopal Church, scorned the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ as “a
conjuring trick with bones.”186
64
The Episcopal Church’s theology is Satanic, so it is no wonder there are such characters
running it. Like the Catholic Church, the Episcopal Church teaches the false salvation by works
through the seven so called sacraments of infant baptism, confirmation, penance, Eucharist, holy
orders, matrimony, and unction. The Episcopal Church also teaches that during consecration, the
bread and wine of communion is transubstantiated into the actual body, blood, soul, and divinity
of Christ. The doctrine of transubstantiation is patent idolatry and blasphemy. The
transformation of the Episcopal church into a child of the great harlot of Babylon was
accomplished by crypto-Jews and crypto-Catholics working within the Episcopal church.
65


Sorry, in diesem Forum dürfen nur registrierte Benutzer schreiben.

Hier klicken um sich einzuloggen